I'm what you might call a sexual relativist. I'll try pretty much anything once. If I like it, good, if not, whatever. Except of course, anything involving children/animals/or poop. But, anything else is worth at least considering. If it's something really out there, I'd probably "test" it out first, like role play the situation or this of a substatute to see if I'm comfortable with the idea. Oddly, though, I'd perfer snuggling and kissing to sex 80% of the time. I think that's just because I don't feel comfortable being a freak with my daughter in the next room.
after a point of experience, sex just becomes...a motion the body responds too...not pleasurable by itself, but if you add a hint of...mental stimulation...that's when it becomes a magnificent thing...ultimately it is the little things that count between a couple.
it's nice to see someone open minded enough to consider other possibilities...too many people would rather condemn than inquire.
__________________
In The Silence Of The Darkness, When All Are Fast Asleep, I Live Inside A Dream, Calling To Your Spirit.
~manowar~
People's first reactions to something new and different is that it's "wrong", when in fact I don't think that there are very many things that can be considered wrong in the world. Nearly everything is situational. The only wrong I think is universal is anything involving the abuse of a child. Wether it be mental, physical, or sexual. Other than that, there is pretty much a time and a place for everything and you'd really have to look at the whole picture to know if it is truely worng. I guess I'm a bit of a relativist, but hey... it makes sence to me.
